Rechercher dans ce blog

Tuesday, February 2, 2021

2 FBI Agents Killed Serving Warrant In Florida Child Exploitation Case - Forbes

Topline

Two FBI agents were killed and three were injured in a shooting Tuesday morning while investigating a child exploitation case in the Miami suburb of Sunrise, Fla., an incident that left a subject of the investigation dead.

Key Facts

The FBI says its agents arrived in a residential neighborhood in Sunrise early Tuesday morning to serve a search warrant in a violent crimes against children case, sparking what the bureau described as an “agent-involved shooting” at around 6 a.m.

Two FBI agents are now dead and three were wounded, and the subject of the warrant is also dead, the FBI’s Miami field office said in a statement (the FBI has not released the identities of the agents or subject).

Two FBI agents were brought to a hospital and are in stable condition.

Local police in Sunrise told the Washington Post the subject of the warrant barricaded themselves inside an apartment (a spokesperson for the Sunrise Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment).

What To Watch For

The FBI told Forbes the shooting is under investigation, but the agency did not offer any additional details.

Tangent

At around 9 a.m., the Sunrise Police Department said the area near the shooting is safe, but police are keeping some nearby streets closed and are asking neighbors to stay at home.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( 2 FBI Agents Killed Serving Warrant In Florida Child Exploitation Case - Forbes )
https://ift.tt/3asT8Fv
Case

LIVE: At least one FBI agent killed serving child exploitation case warrant in Florida, report says - KSNB Local 4

SUNRISE, Fla. (AP) — Two FBI agents were fatally shot and three wounded Tuesday while serving a federal search warrant in a child exploitation case in South Florida, authorities said.

The suspect also died at some point during the standoff in which he barricaded himself inside a home, said FBI Miami Special Agent Michael D. Leverock.

Two of the wounded agents were taken to hospitals to be treated and were in stable condition, Leverock said, adding that the names of the deceased agents will not be released immediately. The suspect’s name also was not released.

The agents had arrived to serve a federal search warrant in connection with a case involving violent crimes against children, Leverock said.

Law enforcement agencies swarmed the neighborhood in the Fort Lauderdale suburb of Sunrise after the shooting. Another large contingent of officers gathered outside a Fort Lauderdale hospital where victims were taken, according to television video.

The shooting happened around 6 a.m. in a middle-class neighborhood of single family homes, duplexes and apartment buildings. Hours later, Sunrise Police urged residents of Water Terrace to remain inside their homes while law enforcement blocked the entrances to their community.

___

Balsamo contributed from Washington. Frieda Frisaro contributed from Fort Lauderdale.

*Update" 11:10am: The following is an official statement provided by the FBI in reference to the incident at 10100 block...

Posted by City of Sunrise Police Department on Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( LIVE: At least one FBI agent killed serving child exploitation case warrant in Florida, report says - KSNB Local 4 )
https://ift.tt/3rdS27j
Case

House Democrats Make Case for Convicting Trump - The Wall Street Journal

Former President Donald Trump will soon face a second impeachment trial.

Former President Donald Trump will soon face a second impeachment trial.

Photo: alex edelman/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( House Democrats Make Case for Convicting Trump - The Wall Street Journal )
https://ift.tt/2YA00eX
Case

Monday, February 1, 2021

Federal judge removed from sex discrimination case after circuit rules he ‘stifled’ professor’s access to fairness - Houston Chronicle

A judge with a history of belittling women has been yanked from a sex discrimination case by an appellate panel that said he “suffocated” a female plaintiff’s access to fundamental fairness.

The case began going downhill when U.S. District Judge Lynn N. Hughes quipped he would “get credit for closing two cases when I crush you.”

Finding he had prejudged and been “arbitrary and unreasonable,” the 5th U.S. Circuit ruled on Friday that Hughes should be removed from ruling on a psychology professor’s challenges against two universities and another judge must start from scratch. The cases have been re-assigned to Judge Andrew S. Hanen.

A trio of male judges from the conservative circuit ruled that Hughes lumped in the woman’s complaints about her employer with other unrelated cases, he repeatedly failed to give her chance to request documents through the discovery process and he did not allow the professor, Audrey K. Miller, to respond before dismissing her requests on the spot. The judge also made “off-key remarks” about how much Miller complained, and suggested the defense lawyers pursue a dismissal, they said.

Judges E. Grady Jolly, Leslie H. Southwick and Cory T. Wilson said in a opinion penned by Wilson that, “Although we are never quick to second-guess a district court’s management of discovery, we must do so here.”

“To put it simply,” they said. “the court’s discovery restrictions suffocated any chance for Miller fairly to present her claims.”

Miller should be entitled to “a full and fair opportunity to make her case in a fair and impartial forum,” the judges said, adding that, “Fundamental to the judiciary is the public’s confidence in the impartiality of our judges and the proceedings over which they preside.”

Hughes did not respond to a request for comment. Lawyers on both sides did not respond to requests for comment.

Hughes, 79, a Houston native, has served since his appointment by President Ronald Reagan in 1985.

He has drawn attention and criticism for his remarks and rulings. He issued a rare “order of ineptitude” to a terrorism prosecutor from Washington, D.C., who showed up to his courtroom in a track suit. In 2013, the circuit\criticized Hughes for dismissing comments allegedly made by a Fort Bend ISD official that if Barack Obama were to be elected president, the Statue of Liberty would have its torch replaced by a piece of fried chicken.

Lawyers responding to a 2019 Houston Bar Association poll found he needed the most improvement in being impartial, following the law, using lawyers’ time efficiently and being courteous to attorneys and witnesses.

The 5th Circuit admonished Hughes in 2018 after remarks to a female prosecutor about women that the court found “demeaning, inappropriate and beneath the dignity of a federal judge.”

The sanction in the criminal case came after Hughes said of a female prosecutor, “It was a lot simpler when you guys wore dark suits, white shirts and navy ties… We didn’t let girls do it in the old days.” Hughes previously explained to the Houston Chronicle he was speaking about an FBI agent and referring to the exclusion of women historically. He did not see his 2017 remarks as derogatory, he said.

The following year Hughes banished the female prosecutor in that case from his courtroom and told U.S. Attorney Ryan Patrick, who stood up on her behalf, that he wouldn’t budge on the matter.

In the current civil matter before Hughes, Miller claimed Sam Houston State University and University of Houston-Downtown discriminated against her in job opportunities because she was a woman. The circuit found Hughes moved quickly through the court proceedings not giving Miller a chance to fully make her case. The court failed to give the Huntsville professor adequate opportunity to respond to his plans to dismiss her claims.

The judge then dismissed both cases “sua sponte,” without prompting by the parties.

Tom Berg, a criminal attorney who has appeared in Hughes’ courtroom many times, noted that while he wasn’t involved in the case, “A fair reading of Miller suggests that Judge Hughes stepped in it again, as the court cites a previous Hughes case critical of his penchant to be preemptive.”

Berg said that such rulings are rare and he suspects that the outcome of Miller’s case would have been the same if she’d been given the full range of rights. “Nonetheless, due process entitles a litigant a fair chance to present her case,” he said. “This is not about winning the cases but presenting them.

gabrielle.banks@chron.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Federal judge removed from sex discrimination case after circuit rules he ‘stifled’ professor’s access to fairness - Houston Chronicle )
https://ift.tt/3tchPih
Case

The 16 Best Samsung Galaxy S21 Cases Add Protection And Style - Forbes

The new Samsung Galaxy S21 smartphone looks stunning, so, you’d be wise to keep it that way, and the best method of achieving that (apart from not putting it in the same pocket as your keys) is a case. There are lots of unique options among the best Samsung Galaxy S21 cases, so you’ll need to decide which kind you prefer.

A folio case that wraps round back and front for total protection and a place for your credit cards, perhaps? How about a sleeve so you can handle the phone on its own but keep it safe when you’re not using it? Other options include a super-strong protective case, one that just protects the back, or one that’s see-through to show off the beautiful colors like Phantom Violet that Samsung has dreamed up this time.

All of the cases below will protect your phone, and they all look good in their own right, complementing the elegant design of the Galaxy S21.


Read More On Samsung Galaxy S21:

The clear choice

Zagg Gear4 Crystal Palace

Zagg’s Gear4 sub-brand has built brilliant shock protection into this attractive clear case. It uses D3O, a soft and flexible special material which hardens instantaneously on impact, dissipating shock and working as a brilliant impact protector. It works for drops of up to 13 feet. Even so, it’s slim and soft to the touch.

Because this case is clear, you can see the phone and its mesmerizing color in all its glory, and because of anti-yellowing properties, it’ll keep it that way.


The coolest folio

Samsung Galaxy S21 LED Wallet Cover

Samsung has made a very special folio for its new phone. It wraps the handset completely, including the camera panel, so it’s all tucked away safely. Inside the front cover there’s also room for one credit card or transit card, whatever you prefer.

But there’s more. The front cover lets light from the display shine through in a clever way. You have to download a free app for this, but once you’ve done that, the cover can light up to display the current time, for instance. Another cool function is being able to choose which icons show up when a call comes in, and you can answer the call by tapping the cover–you don’t need to open it to touch the screen itself.


Like there’s no case at all

Totallee Super Thin

Totallee’s cases are preposterously thin and light, so there’s no extra bulk or weight to add to your phone. Protection levels are no match for the sturdier cases here, and the screen isn’t as well guarded as on others, but the benefit is a superb feel and look.

There are two options—a solid black matte finish or a completely transparent one. Both are a perfect fit and there’s a raised part around the camera panel to protect the lenses.


Slim, cute and strong

Otterbox Symmetry Series

One brand that’s especially synonymous with strong protection is Otterbox. Its Symmetry series adds great looks and a slim profile to the mix. Choose from Rock Candy Blue (even the color names are great!), Shell Shocked Graphic and, er, Black.

It’s the slimness that stands out, though–strong protection often requires more bulkiness than this. There’s also silver baked in; not to make it more valuable, but to add an antimicrobial property so your case stays bacteria-free.


Protection with a kickstand

Spigen Tough Armor

Spigen’s latest has a new kind of foam built into the inside of the case which offers extra shock protection, additional to the air cushion technology built into each corner. It adds fractionally to the thickness of the case (Spigen says 0.17in) but it’s still highly manageable. And there’s another benefit here: the back has an integrated kickstand which folds out so you can watch video on the magnificent high-refresh rate Galaxy S21 screen without having to lean the phone precariously.


Affordable clarity

ESR Clear Case

How about something slim, clear and, above all, cheap? ESR’s thin case looks great and fits like a dream. The soft-to-the-touch finish means it feels great in the hand, too.

The edge on the front is slightly raised, so there’s some protection for the display as well, though a screen protector will help with that. There’s also a raised area that fits right around the camera to keep that safe too.


Sparkling good taste

Tech21 Evo Sparkle

Perhaps you’d like something a little eye-catching. Well, the shimmering Evo Sparkle should do the trick. It’s strong enough to protect for falls of up to 10ft, and with an anti-microbial quality that reduces germs almost completely, this is an appealing choice. The holographic effect is excellent and it’ll stay that way thanks to the scratch resistance that’s built in.


Picture this

Casetify Red Roses

Casetify makes a dizzyingly wide range of cases and there are plenty of attractive-looking ones. Take this Red Roses case which is partly transparent so the color of your S21 will shine through.

The cases have one thing in common–Casetify’s logo that edges round the camera panel. There’s decent, rather than outstanding, shock absorption, but there’s just enough to protect against a drop of around 6ft thanks to the company’s proprietary shock absorbing material. It also uses an antimicrobial coating called Defensify.


Pop it to me

Otterbox Otter + Pop Symmetry

If you like using your phone with a PopSocket, Otterbox has you covered. This case, which comes in fetching color called Tranquil Waters Light Teal as well as Black, is a bit bulkier than some of the brand’s other cases, but that’s because it has a cunningly placed dimple in the back, out of which you can spring a PopSockets PopGrip. You can also remove it and replace it with a different colored or patterned PopGrip. It also has an antimicrobial element to keep it free from germs.


The ultimate protection

Mous Clarity Lite

Mous makes astonishingly good protective cases, with truly outstanding shock protection, all down to the company’s own AiroShock technology. This is the company’s first ever completely clear case; previous Clarity cases were clear with a black edge.

Where the Mous case excels is that although it’s light and slim, it has ingeniously crafted edges that are bigger in the corners than on the long edges. This provides the phone with protection on the front as well as the back, and you won’t feel that when the phone is against your cheek.


Slim and light

Bare Naked

Another super-slim case, the Naked case from Bare is a great way to make it feel like you’re using it without a case. It means there’s very little protection on the screen, so you really do need a protector here, and the stronger the better. But the feel is what you’re going for here, and it’s great.

There’s a plain black finish or a splendid frost finish which lets the color of the phone peep through. Bare admits it’s not the greatest for drop protection, though, and it can scratch on a rough surface.


Best leather case

Samsung leather cover

Samsung’s own case is tremendous if you’re looking for a leather protector. Unlike most cases, this one offers full protection for the camera panel by enveloping it in leather. Because it’s made by Samsung, you can be confident it’ll be a perfect fit and the cameras will be able to perform with no obstruction.

The case is slim enough to add little in the way of size or weight to the phone but the leather reaches round the front of the case, enough to protect the display’s edges. It’s available in brown or black finishes.


The silicone folio

Olixar Genuine Leather Ultra Wallet Case

The silicone in this wallet case means it’s genuinely soft to the touch and reasonably non-slip, so it’s less likely to jump out of your hand or slide off the table. The card slot is big enough for several cards, which is useful. There’s also a built-in stand so you can fold the case to perfectly position your phone for video playback.


The unmissable sleeve

fitBAG Bonga Dalmatian Custom Tailored Sleeve

If you like feeling of the Galaxy S21 itself, then a sleeve is more ideal than a case. The phone rings, you slip the protective sleeve off and it’s just you and the Galaxy. The sleeves from fitBAG come in lots of finishes, including this imitation fur (no actual dogs are in the sleeve, don’t worry).

The internal of the sleeve is microfiber, so every time you take it off, it cleans the display. There are also patterns that look like giraffe, leopard or zebra spots.


Funky and tactile

Caseology Parallax

Caseology’s Parallax case has a cool rear pattern and fits the hand securely thanks to the grippy 3D finish. There’s decent protection on board with not too much added bulk, and raised edges protect the cameras, for instance, from inadvertent scratches. Choose from Indi Pink, Ash Gray, Matte Black and Purple-ish, the last of which really stands out.


Lightweight protection

Spigen Liquid Air Armor

This case is thin and lightweight but still manages to offer strong protection, and the gently textured back keeps it from escaping your grip. It still manages to squeeze in Air Cushion technology for peace of mind if you’re clumsy.

Not to mention that it feels good to hold when you’re playing a game, reading a book or bingeing YouTube. There’s also enough of a lip that creeps round the front of the phone to protect the display.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( The 16 Best Samsung Galaxy S21 Cases Add Protection And Style - Forbes )
https://ift.tt/3cxme9E
Case

With 3,287 new coronavirus cases, Ohio case total nears 900,000: Monday update - cleveland.com

COLUMBUS, Ohio - An additional 3,287 coronavirus cases reported Monday bring the state’s case total to 899,079, according to the Ohio Department of Health.

The number of deaths increased Monday by 55, to a total of 11,230 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic last year.

Monday’s cases fell below the 21-day rolling average of 5,434 cases. Deaths fell below the 21-day average of 73.

The state follows the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s definition of a “case,” which includes those diagnosed through genetic PCR or antigen tests, or people diagnosed in a clinical setting -- experiencing symptoms who are linked to a confirmed COVID-19 case, among other criteria.

Other figures Monday:

-30,248 doses of vaccine had been administered since Sunday’s report, bringing the total to 853,965 doses. The Department of Health is still not reporting how many of these are second doses. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported at least 163,622 people in Ohio have received their second dose.

-30,787 more coronavirus tests were reported to have been performed since Sunday. The state only counts molecular and PCR tests in this figure.

-8% of coronavirus PCR and molecular tests came back positive on Saturday, the most recent day for positivity rate. The seven-day rolling average from Saturday is 8%. For comparison, the average positivity rate on Jan. 1 was 14%. On Dec. 1, it was 14.3. On Nov. 1, it was 6.7%.

-60 more people were hospitalized with coronavirus since Sunday, to a total of 2,521.

Outside Ohio:

-103.2 million cases have been tracked globally, according to Johns Hopkins University. That includes 2.2 million deaths.

-In the U.S., there’s been 26.2 million cases and 441,000 deaths.

-The U.S. leads in deaths, followed by Brazil, with 224,000 deaths, and Mexico, with 158,000 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins.

More coverage:

Gov. Mike DeWine recognizes Black History Month by incorrectly recycling proclamation from 2020

Lt. Gov. Jon Husted not running for U.S. Senate, others still considering: Capitol Letter

Read the Ohio coronavirus public health order reducing the overnight curfew by 1 hour

Ohio Liquor Control Commission revokes Cleveland’s Barley House liquor permit, effective March 24

Ohio Supreme Court to decide limits of Marsy’s Law in kidnapping, rape trial

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( With 3,287 new coronavirus cases, Ohio case total nears 900,000: Monday update - cleveland.com )
https://ift.tt/3tjziFm
Case

The Case of the Serial Sperm Donor - The New York Times

In 2015, Vanessa van Ewijk, a carpenter in the Netherlands, decided that she wanted to have a child. She was 34 and single, and so, like many women, she sought out a sperm donor.

She considered conceiving through a fertility clinic, but the cost was prohibitive for her. Instead, she found an ideal candidate through a website called Desire for a Child, one of a growing number of online sperm markets that match candidate donors directly with potential recipients. Ms. van Ewijk was drawn to one profile in particular, that of Jonathan Jacob Meijer, a Dutch musician in his 30s.

Mr. Meijer was handsome, with blue eyes and a mane of curly blond hair. Ms. van Ewijk liked how genuine he appeared. “I spoke to him on the phone and he seemed gentle and kind and well-behaved,” she said. “He liked music, and he talked about his thoughts on life. He didn’t come on strong in any sense. He seemed like the boy next door.”

About a month later, after some back-and-forth, she and Mr. Meijer arranged to meet at Central Station, a busy railway hub in The Hague. He provided her with his sperm, and in return she paid him 165 euros, about $200, and covered his travel costs. Months later she gave birth to a daughter — her first child and, Mr. Meijer told her, his eighth. (Mr. Meijer declined to be interviewed for this article but did answer some questions by email, and stated that he did not grant permission for his name to be published.)

In 2017, when she decided to conceive again, she reached out once more to Mr. Meijer. Once again he met with her and, for a similarly modest fee, provided a container of his semen; once again she became pregnant, and gave birth to a boy.

Even before then, however, Ms. van Ewijk had learned some unsettling news. She had connected on Facebook with another single mother who also had used Mr. Meijer as a donor, and who told her that, according to an investigation in 2017 by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, he had fathered at least 102 children in the Netherlands through numerous fertility clinics, a tally that did not include his private donations through websites.

Ms. van Ewijk wanted her children to be full siblings, so she still wanted Mr. Meijer to be the donor. Nonetheless, she was alarmed. The Netherlands is a small country, home to 17 million people; the more half siblings there are in the population who are unknown to one another, the greater the odds that two of them might meet unwittingly and produce children of their own — children with a heightened risk of carrying hereditary defects.

Furious, Ms. van Ewijk confronted Mr. Meijer. He admitted that he had produced at least 175 children and conceded that there might be more.

“He said, ‘I’m just helping women make their biggest wish come true,’” Ms. van Ewijk recalled. “I said: ‘You’re not helping anymore! How do I tell my kids that they could possibly have 300 siblings?’”

She may have only known the half of it.

Vanessa van Ewijk and her two children in Lisserbroek, the Netherlands. “How do I tell my kids that they could possibly have 300 siblings?” she said.
Ilvy Njiokiktjien for The New York Times

The first child of in vitro fertilization was born in 1978, and in the decades since, sperm donation has become a thriving global business, as fertility clinics, sperm banks and private donors have sought to meet the demand of parents eager to conceive.

As an industry, however, it is poorly regulated. A patchwork of laws ostensibly addresses who can donate, where and how often, in part to avoid introducing or amplifying genetic disabilities in a population. In Germany, a sperm-clinic donor may not produce more than 15 children; in the United Kingdom the cap is 10 families of unlimited children. In the Netherlands, Dutch law prohibits donating anonymously, and nonbinding guidelines limit clinic donors to 25 children and from donating at more than one clinic in the country. In the United States there are no legal limits, only guidelines from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine: 25 children per donor in a population of 800,000.

Regulation is even more scarce internationally. There is little to stop a sperm donor from donating at clinics in countries other than his own, or at global agencies like Cryos International, the world’s biggest sperm clinic, in Denmark, which ships semen to more than 100 countries.

“There’s nothing in the U.S. or anywhere that would keep a donor from donating at more than one sperm bank,” said Wendy Kramer, a co-founder and the executive director of the Donor Sibling Registry, an organization in the United States that supports donor families. “The sperm banks claim that they ask the donor if they’ve donated anywhere else, but nobody knows if they really do.”

And few if any laws govern private donations, of the kind that Ms. van Ewijk and Mr. Meijer arranged through the internet. Through these gaps, several cases have emerged of donors who have fathered scores of children or more, and of grown children discovering, often through social media, that they have not just a handful of half siblings but dozens of them.

In 2019, the Dutch Donor Child Foundation, an advocacy group that facilitates legal and emotional support for donor-conceived people and their families and helps search for biological relatives, determined through DNA testing that Dr. Jan Karbaat, a fertility specialist who died in 2017, had secretly fathered at least 68 children, born to women who visited his clinic near Rotterdam.

At least one sperm donor in the Netherlands, known as Louis, is thought to have more than 200 offspring, many of whom are unaware of one another. Six years ago Ivo van Halen, a 36-year-old Dutch I.T. consultant, learned that he was among them. Since then, he has managed to connect directly with 42 of his half siblings.

“It’s been a shock to learn how to integrate 42 brothers and sisters into your life,” Mr. van Halen said in an interview. “There are no books on how to do that. Our group is at 70 known children already, and getting new matches every month.”

Some of his half siblings have encountered each other multiple times on Tinder, the dating app. One half brother, Jordy Willekens, who lives in The Hague, matched online with four half sisters. “Once, I swiped on a sister and she swiped right on me at the same time,” Mr. Willekens said.

The group keeps a list of potential siblings to refer to before going on a date. Mr. Willekens, who is now in a relationship, said he had been very careful when dating: “I have a very trained eye by now.”

Thomas Fredberg/Science Source

Some sperm donors, like Dr. Karbaat, donate surreptitiously and illegally, leaving their identities and the scale of their activity to be discovered many years later by their offspring, often as a shock.

Other donors are openly profligate. Ari Nagel, a math professor in New York, donates exclusively online and directly with recipients; he has been nicknamed the “Target Donor” because he sometimes meets women in public spots, such as Target stores, to hand off his sperm. He told The New York Times that he had 76 biological children. Simon Watson, a donor in the United Kingdom who regularly updates his Facebook site with photos of his offspring, told the BBC in 2016 that he had at least 800 children around the world.

Mr. Meijer appears to have adopted both approaches, registering at more clinics than is recommended while also donating privately.

In 2017, after confronting Mr. Meijer, Ms. van Ewijk notified the Dutch Donor Child Foundation that he had many more children than he had initially revealed, and that he had been donating sperm at several clinics. The group already knew of him, from other mothers with the same complaint.

The foundation soon determined that Mr. Meijer had privately fathered at least 80 children in the Netherlands, in addition to the 102 that the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport had identified through 11 clinics in the country. The government ordered all Dutch sperm clinics to stop using Mr. Meijer’s semen.

(Because of Dutch privacy laws, the government has not publicly named Mr. Meijer as the donor in question. However, in an email to The Times, a spokesman for the health ministry confirmed his identity. “Donors must sign an agreement with their clinic that they don’t donate sperm at other clinics,” Gerrit-Jan KleinJan wrote. “The sperm donor you are writing about made this agreement as well. Nevertheless, he donated at more sperm banks resulting in 102 babies.”)

Ms. van Ewijk subsequently became friends with two other Dutch mothers who had used Mr. Meijer as a donor. The two worked together in the same preschool and realized they shared the same donor after noticing that their children, both 9, looked alike.

The two women, who requested anonymity to protect their children’s privacy, said that they in turn knew several other women in their city, Almere, who had used Mr. Meijer as a donor. One mother expressed concern that some of these half siblings could accidentally meet and have a relationship.

“It’s disgusting and I want it to stop,” she said. “It’s dangerous for the children. There are more brothers and sisters in Almere, and they can fall in love. It’s not good.”

Tim Bueter, a lawyer in the Netherlands who represented the families in the case of Dr. Karbaat, said he had been contacted by 12 mothers who had used Mr. Meijer’s sperm. They wanted to know if there was any legal action they could take against him. Mr. Bueter said there was very little they could do, as no laws applied.

“It was stunning to hear that something like this is going on,” Mr. Bueter said. “The children are the victims in this case. Something has to be done to stop him. The only thing these women can do is go to the public and hope everyone in the world knows not to use this guy as a sperm donor.”

Gleb Garanich/Reuters

Joëlle de Boer, a volunteer and the international contact person at the Dutch Donor Child Foundation, has been tracking Mr. Meijer’s activity. According to her research, he has been traveling throughout Europe, Scandinavia and Ukraine for several years, donating sperm since 2007 at various clinics as well as privately on the internet.

“Two weeks ago I went to donate in Kiev at Biotexcom clinic,” he wrote on Facebook in June 2017, referring to the BioTexCom Center for Human Reproduction in Ukraine, which uses donated sperm for in vitro fertilization and surrogacy. “The lady I helped used an egg-donor from Ukraine which will be fertilized with my sperm. I must say this was one of the best experiences I have with clinics!”

Ms. de Boer has also been tabulating Mr. Meijer’s online presence, including on eight private donation websites in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. On one site, he advertised himself as a blond “musical Viking donor.” She shared with The Times screen shots of private-donation sites on which a donor with Mr. Meijer’s photo accompanied false names, including “Lukas” and “Martijn.” Asked to comment, Mr. Meijer said in an email, “I never ever donated under false names.”

In addition, Mr. Meijer has registered with at least one international sperm bank, Cryos, which does not set an overall limit on how many children a donor may generate, although it claims to adhere to the limits set by each country to which it donates. Still, with each bank exporting to scores of countries, a single donor could potentially produce hundreds or even thousands of children around the world.

Moreover, unlike sperm banks in the Netherlands, which prohibit anonymous donation, international sperm banks commonly register donors under an alias or a number. Also, they rely on clients to voluntarily report the births of their children when keeping track of sperm donor offspring, and that tally is not always accurate. And there is no international registry of sperm donors, so a recipient has no easy way of knowing where else her donor might have donated or how many half siblings her children might have.

Ms. de Boer said she has been in touch with mothers who have had children by Mr. Meijer in Australia, Italy, Serbia, Ukraine, Germany, Poland, Hungary, Switzerland, Romania, Denmark, Sweden, Mexico and the United States. Several were in contact with the two Dutch mothers who are friends of Ms. van Ewijk, and they confirmed their accounts with this reporter.

A German woman told The Times that she acquired Mr. Meijer’s sperm through Cryos; although he donated under an alias, she was able to figure out his real name. In 2019 she received a letter from Cryos notifying her that her donor “has donated in countries outside of Denmark, therefore breaching the contract he had with Cryos to donate exclusively to our sperm bank.”

The letter added, “This means that the donor has allegedly achieved more pregnancies than the pregnancies registered in our system.” The company also notified the Danish health authorities, the letter said, and had stopped distributing his semen.

In an email, Mr. Meijer said he did not recall being told that he was barred from donating at other clinics: “Clinics did intensive health and genetics screening and interviewing and I passed them all but I do not remember this procedure clearly to say anything about it.” In a second email he said, “There were no strict agreements amongst sperm banks (up until recently) to check if donors hadn’t been donating elsewhere.”

Reached for comment, Peter Reeslev, the chief executive of Cryos, insisted that a Cryos donor could not have signed up without being aware of the exclusivity clause. “NO,” he wrote in an email. “Donors sign and commit in contractual terms to not donate in any other tissue establishments than Cryos before and undertake not to donate sperm to other sperm banks/tissue centers in the future as well.”

He added, “On a general level, Cryos disassociates itself from any form of serial sperm donation due to the importance of not exceeding national pregnancy quotas” in each country to which they send sperm.

Exactly how many donor children Mr. Meijer has around the world is impossible to say. But Ties van der Meer, the director of the Dutch Donor Child Foundation, and his colleagues have calculated that if Mr. Meijer’s known pattern of clinic and private donation was any indicator, the number could run to several hundred, even 1,000.

In an email, Mr. Meijer dismissed that conclusion. “I have approximately 250 children,” he said. “Assumptions of 1,000 are ridiculous. I am disappointed by the obsession of the numbers. I became a donor not for any numbers but out of love to help parents with realizing their dream. I cannot understand how anyone can only focus on numbers and see my donor children as a number.”

Ted Soqui/Corbis via Getty Images

To combat the serial-donor problem, officials in the Netherlands are implementing various measures, including the creation of a central registry for sperm donors, to prevent men from donating at several clinics at the same time, said Dr. Monique H. Mochtar, chair of the Gamete Donation Special Interest Group. Moreover, because of Mr. Meijer, the recommended limit of 25 children per donor at sperm clinics is expected to be amended into law this spring, restricting one donor to 12 mothers nationally.

But challenges and loopholes remain at the international level. “The lack of any regulatory and legislative bodies for the international fertility industry lets companies claim and do whatever they want,” Mr. van der Meer, of the Dutch Donor Child Foundation, said. “We need international legislation and help for all families that have been hurt by the actions of donors like this man.”

The issue of serial sperm donation has been recognized in other countries as well. Christina Motejl, a lawyer in Berlin, is a member of Donor Offspring Europe, a network of organizations of donor-conceived adults in Europe. She said that the group was concerned about donors who travel around Europe trying to father as many children as possible.

“It’s kind of disgusting in a narcissistic way,” she said. “No sane person would want 100 children or more. The big question is why? These men want confirmation that they’re a great guy and everybody wants them.”

Judith Daar, who leads the ethics committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, said that although there is often a reluctance to regulate assisted reproduction more strictly than natural conception, it might be appropriate in extreme cases, including in Mr. Meijer’s, to impose limits on the number of offspring that any one donor may have.

She noted that men who donate through social media, eschewing the paperwork of a sperm bank or a doctor, could end up surprised by devastating legal consequences.

“Donors should be aware that, depending on state law, they may be deemed legal parents of any resulting offspring,” said Ms. Daar, who is also the dean at Northern Kentucky University’s Chase College of Law and the author of “The New Eugenics: Selective Breeding in an Era of Reproductive Technologies.” She also encouraged women to verify a donor’s health and genetic testing through qualified experts, rather than taking the donor’s word for it.

KC Nwakalor for The New York Times

What compels a sperm donor to donate so profusely?

In 2013, a journal article by the Donor Sibling Registry identified three main motives, at least for average donors: money, generosity and the desire to pass along their DNA.

“I think you have to look at No. 3, passing on their genes to have children,” said Ms. Kramer, the registry’s executive director. “Is it part of some men’s DNA to do this? What makes a man donate for six years? Ten years? If each donation can create between 4 and 24 kids, they can do the math. Why wouldn’t they think twice about this?”

The financial compensation for donating in some countries is fairly meager, but some donors have forged a lifestyle by agreeing to a nominal fee in exchange for travel costs to meet recipients in person.

Mr. Nagel, who is 45 and unmarried, said that women had flown him all over the world for his sperm, including to Israel, Southeast Asia, Ghana and the Philippines. When reached by this reporter, Mr. Nagel was preparing to fly to Mexico to help with an insemination, then on to Florida, Maryland and Virginia, to meet with some of his offspring for their birthdays.

Mr. Meijer has likewise traveled often and far afield, including to Argentina, China, New Zealand and Australia, according to his donor profile at Cryos.

The profile, under the required alias, notes that after college he worked as a high school social science teacher and now “is working with cryptocurrency in a development and trading company.” His strengths include “my optimism and always joyful character.” His weaknesses: “Since I am a dreamer I always need to focus on doing things the right way because if I don’t, I forget to do them. Sometimes I need a lot of time on my own to reflect because I have a sensitive character.”

Like many donors, Mr. Meijer said that his intentions were charitable, to help people who wanted to start a family. “The demand is still extremely huge and the amount of capable donors is low,” he said in an email.

Mr. Nagel offered a similar sentiment. “I love having kids,” he said. “It’s nice to help grow so many beautiful families, and to see how happy they are and how much love is going around.”

But Mr. van der Meer, who is donor-conceived and has donated sperm, said that some donors seemed to be engaged almost in a competition to see who could father the most children.

In an email, Mr. Meijer said: “I know people are quickly judging me or thinking that I donate for narcissistic reasons. But I am quite down to earth about myself and I don’t think too highly about myself. (I prefer to be honest to myself and see my shortcomings and my good sides.) But what motivates me as a donor is just to do something really big with just a little bit of help, the appreciation of the recipients and the warm feelings and memories I share with the children and the recipients.”

The warm feelings are not necessarily mutual. A mother in Australia who purchased Mr. Meijer’s sperm through Cryos and had a child said she was disturbed by how many children he turned out to have. (She asked that her name not be used, for privacy reasons.) She and 50 or so other mothers who used his sperm have formed a group, Moms on a Mission, to try to get him to stop donating.

Their goal is to connect with as many other parents as they can, to find out the true number of offspring he has produced, so that their children can contact each other as they get older. Many of the mothers wonder how their children will ever be able to have a relationship with their biological father when he has so many other children. The group also advocates for the creation of an international database of sperm donors.

“That way these men can’t just donate whenever they want and create all these children in the world without parents even consenting to the fact,” the Australian mother said. “I can’t imagine what our son is going to think when he finds out.”


[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( The Case of the Serial Sperm Donor - The New York Times )
https://ift.tt/3cvyKqa
Case

Search

Featured Post

Opinion | The Case for ‘Hibernating’ During Winter - The New York Times

As the days shorten and the dark hours stretch, every impulse in me is to slow down, get under a blanket and stay there till spring. In a...

Postingan Populer